Abandoned & Little-Known Airfields
Posted January 27, 2007 by John Menick
Posted January 27, 2007 by John Menick
Posted January 18, 2007 by John Menick
Posted January 18, 2007 by John Menick
I can’t help thinking these two stories have something to do with one another. The first comes from Chris Anderson’s Longtail blog, and concerns his visit to the Zappos’ Las Vegas headquarters. Actually, the entry is about random inventory storage: according to Anderson, it’s easier for companies like Zappos to randomly store inventory rather than in some hierarchical taxonomy.
[Zappos] made peace with messiness. The shoes are logged in by UPC when they arrive and assigned a spot wherever there is room available. When it comes time to pick-and-pack, the computers tell the warehouse staff where to go. No single trip is optimized, but the system as a whole works as a minimum-effort machine. Just as random access works best for bits in disk drives, it turns out to be great for atoms in warehouses, too.
The second archive-related story comes via “we make money not art.” The blog points to an article in Deutsche Welle on the work of Anke Heelemann, an artist from Weimar. She’s been purchasing entire boxes of discarded private photos and displaying them in her storefront in Weimar. Members of the public can come and “adopt” the photos. Unlike Zappos, Heelemann is not letting chaos reign, and instead she has “begun categorizing photos and filing them according to themes. “Beach,” “animals,” and “birthday” are among the more obvious ones while others are called “Handbags” or “linked arms.”
In one case, the inventory arrives in a very managed, pre-planned way, and is then stored randomly. In the second, it arrives randomly and is then placed into a somewhat subjective order. Perhaps Heelemann and Zappos should keep their techniques, but switch inventories…
John Menick is an artist and writer living in Brooklyn, NY.
Bio | Resume (PDF)